segunda-feira, 7 de janeiro de 2013


"In pop culture, girls who crush hopelessly on guys they can’t have are painted as just that – hopeless. Over and over again, we’re taught that girls who openly express sexual or romantic interest in guys who don’t want them are pitiable, stalkerish, desperate, crazy bitches. More often than not, they’re also portrayed as ugly – whether physically, emotionally or both – in order to further establish their undesirability as an objective fact. Both narratively and, as a consequence, in real life, men
are given free reign to snub, abuse, mislead and talk down to
such women: we’re raised to believe that female desire is
unseemly, so that any consequent shaming is therefore deserved.
There is no female-equivalent Friend Zone terminology because, in
the language of our culture, a man’s romantic choices are
considered sacrosanct and inviolable. If a girl has been told no,
then she has only herself to blame for anything that happens next – but if a woman says no, then she must not really mean it. Or, if she does, she shouldn’t: the rejected man is a universally sympathetic figure, and everyone from moviegoers to platonic onlookers will scream at her to just give him a chance, as though her rejection must always be unfounded rather than based on the fact that he had a chance, and blew it. And even then, give him another one! The pathos of Single Nice Guys can only be eased by pity-sex with unwilling women that blossoms into romance!"

- Someone

Sem comentários:

Enviar um comentário